The Business Software Alliance`s 2011 Piracy Study Standard estimates the total business value of illegally copied software at $59 billion in 2010, with emerging markets accounting for $31.9 billion, or more than half of the total. In addition, mature markets received fewer PC shipments than emerging markets for the first time in 2010. In addition to software breaches of 68% compared to 24% of mature markets, emerging markets thus hold the majority of the global increase in the business value of counterfeit software. China continues to have the highest trade value of this software among developing countries with $8.9 billion, and the second largest value in the world behind the United States with $9.7 billion in 2011.   In 2011, the Business Software Alliance announced that 83% of PC-based software in Africa had been pirated (with the exception of South Africa).  Since the late 1990s, copyright owners have filed lawsuits against a number of peer-to-peer intermediaries such as pir, Grokster, eMule, SoulSeek, BitTorrent, and Limewire, and case law on the liability of Internet service providers (ISPs) for copyright infringement has emerged, particularly with respect to these cases.  The U.S. No Electronic Theft Act (NET Act), a federal law passed in 1997 in response to LaMacchia, provides for the prosecution of persons who commit copyright infringement in certain circumstances, even if the infringement does not result in monetary gain or commercial advantage. The maximum penalties can be five years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines. The NET Act also increased legal damages by 50%. The court`s decision explicitly drew attention to the loopholes in the current law that allowed people to facilitate mass copyright infringement while being immune from prosecution under copyright law. Peer-to-peer file-sharing intermediaries have been denied access to the Safe Harbor provisions regarding copyright infringement.
A lawsuit against intermediaries such as Napster is usually brought in relation to principles of secondary liability for copyright infringements such as the obligation to cooperate and the liability of the vicarious agent.  Websites that contain original content are automatically protected by international copyright. In other words, you cannot copy content from one website and publish it to another website without the author`s permission. The republication of text, images, videos, audio clips or other content found on the Internet without permission constitutes copyright infringement. The legal penalties for copyright infringement of the Website depend on the extent and damage caused by the copyright infringement. Copyright is a kind of legal protection for original works such as writing, music or photography. Like trademarks and patents, copyrights are a type of property with specific rights. Only the copyright owner may reproduce, sell or publicly exhibit the work. If someone infringes these rights, which is called copyright infringement, you can take legal action against them or use a new, simpler procedure. The exception for personal copies protected by the copyright of EU Member States stems from the 2001 Information Society Directive, which is generally designed to allow EU members to legislate prohibiting the making of copies without authorisation as long as they are intended for personal, non-commercial use.
The Directive should not legitimise file sharing, but the common practice of transferring copyright-protected content from a legally acquired CD (e.g. to certain types of devices and media, provided that rightholders are compensated and no copy protection measures are circumvented. Compensation for rightholders takes different forms in different countries, but it is usually either a tax on “recording devices” and media, or a tax on the content itself. In some countries, such as Canada, the applicability of these laws to copying to general storage devices such as computer hard drives, portable media players and phones for which no levy is levied has been the subject of debate and other efforts to reform copyright law. The 2010 conclusions of the US GAO on the great difficulty of accurately estimating the economic impact of copyright infringement were reinforced in the same report by the Panel`s research on three frequently cited estimates previously made available to the US authorities. The GAO report states that the sources — an estimate from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), a press release from Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and an estimate from the Motor and Equipment Manufacturers Association — “cannot be substantiated or traced back to an underlying data source or methodology.”  Copyright is different from different types of creator security, which are equivalent to patents granting unique rights to inventors, and trademarks that are expressions or symbols protected by law, or certainly different ways of distinguishing that symbolize services or goods. Similarly, a patent protects an achievement or idea, a trademark protects a tool that designates the supplier of certain sellers or items, and copyright protects the expression of a thought. Although the term operative is new in patents, a patent represents a new invention and in no case made earlier. The basic idea behind copyright is originality, so copyright is something that comes from one particular creator and never from another. Copyrights, patents and trademarks are examples of what is recognized as intellectual property in the regulation. Your work does not need to be published to be protected. It is protected from its creation and fixation in tangible form.